Would it not be a discrimination by conferring different forums in different states for trials of certain same Offences under IPC ??

Why does there exist typical difference in respect of forum for trial of certain offences like those under sections 326, 409, 466, 467, 468, 471, 472, 473, 475, 476, 477 and 477A etc.in IPC from State to State ?? Can it be justified in Laws ? Would it not be a discrimination by conferring different forums in different states for trials of certain same Offences under IPC ?? For Instance, The Code of Criminal Procedure (Madhya Pradesh Amendment) Act, 2007, came into force with effect from 22nd February 2008. The amendment interalia changed the forum for the trial of offences punishable under sections 317, 318, 326, 363, 363-A, 365, 377, 392, .393, 394, 409, 435, 466, 467, 468, 471, 472, 473, 475, 476, 477 and 477A, from that of a Court of Magistrate of First Class to that of a Court of Sessions. Whereas offences punishable under Sections 326, 409, 466, 467, 468, 471, 472, 473, 475, 476, 477 and 477A etc. are triable by Courts of The Magistrate in Gujarat and other states of India !

The Mask of Immunity

Who is entitled to the Mask of Immunity in this world ? Whether the foxes or the innocent persons ??? The answer if very simply in my views. The Mask of Immunity must for the Weak and not for the Jackals who are leading and chasing for their own gains. Are those able Leaders ever entitled to any mask of Immunity, when they chase all for their own personal gains and goals ? Are those immune Judges ever entitled to any such mask of Immunity, when they enjoy the power without knowing even lines of laws and spirit of Justice ? Are those able celebrities ever entitled to any such Mask of Immunity, when they can buy and enjoy all amenities at the strength of their money and muscles ? Aren't those weak and poor people ever entitled to any Mask of Immunity, when they neither even enjoy peace nor a single piece of bread and butter in a day breading? Think well before re-organizing our social frame...and Think well again to consider whether providing any such Mask of Immunity to the unqualified persons are not legal and social discriminating activities ? KARTIKEY SHROFF Advocate (Gujarat High Court)

Are our survey for competitive purpose only? Why the concerned public officers are not made responsible

There are lots of government as well as global survey, made every day and put in public to appreciate or degrade someone somewhere.. The vital question is that whether such survey made at the costs of the public money are simply made for 

Competitive purposes only ??! Why the concerned public servants or authorities or even states are not made responsible for any poor performing or results..??? I believe that mere statistics never improve the outcome but all who are truly liable to look after should also be responsible proportionately in the eyes of natural justice to incur the concurrent responsibilities along with credits there with.

Recently so called #vibrant state of GUJARAT has been declared as one of the top most ten sick state of India as per a global survey wherein 42 % children are still suffering from lack of proper nourishment !!!

Are not the State authorities truly responsible for such a poor outcome ??!is not it a direct neglect of the state to take care of its children through public earth programs ???

www.kartikey.com

Justice to Meritorious Students asking for Medical Admission by Gujarat High Court

Justice to Meritorious Students by Gujarat High Court ::: In a setback to the state government of Gujarat, The division bench of Gujarat High Court on Monday quashed the new rule introduced earlier this year, giving 100% preference in admissions of medical students on NRI quota of Gujarat. The Gujarat High Court​ termed this new Rule as unconstitutional and ultimately quashed in a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) challenging the new law citing injustice to meritorious students from other states - See more at: http://indianexpress.com/article/india/gujarat/hc-quashes-new-law-in-medical-admission-on-nri-quota/#sthash.YSFwIHEC.dpuf

Landmark Observation of SC on Evidence Value of Radio-logical Examination in determination of Age

In the matters of Ramdeo Chauhan alias Raj Nath v. State of Assam, the Hon'ble Apex Court has made certain landmark observations in respect of evidence value of radi0-logical examination in determination of age of an victim, such that "The statement of the doctor is no more than an opinion, the court has to base its conclusions upon all the facts and circumstances disclosed on examining of the physical features of the person whose age is in question, in conjunction with such oral testimony as may be available. An X-ray ossification test may provide a surer basis for determining the age of an individual than the opinion of a medical expert but it can by no means be so infallible and accurate a test as to indicate the exact date of birth of the person concerned. Too much of reliance cannot be placed upon textbooks, on medical jurisprudence and toxicology while determining the age of an accused. In this vast country with varied latitudes, heights, environment, vegetation and nutrition, the height and weight cannot be expected to be uniform"